Addressing corruption in post-conflict and transition contexts is one of the major priorities for development actors. One in four people in the world are affected by conflict (United Nations 2024). Corruption is identified as a major factor in derailing political and economic transitions, undermining state capacity and legitimacy, exacerbating poverty and fueling grievances linked to conflict. Often in such contexts, the immediate focus on peace building and state-building comes at the expense of promoting integrity, transparency and accountability in the governance process. Lack of emphasis on transparency and accountability in state-building processes could create opportunities for corruption and limit gains possible from peace.
Corruption in post-conflict environments is often intensified by weak institutions, the legacy of wartime practices, and the rapid inflow of reconstruction resources. In fragile settings, the sudden influx of aid, natural resource revenues or reconstruction funds can overwhelm limited administrative capacities, increasing opportunities for rent-seeking and elite capture. These dynamics can entrench patronage networks, distort rebuilding efforts and diminish public trust in institutions.
To address these challenges, post-conflict anti-corruption strategies must be context-sensitive and sequenced alongside peacebuilding measures. Integrating transparency and accountability into early recovery, such as in disarmament, reintegration, public financial management and reconstruction planning can help prevent corruption from becoming institutionalised. Strengthening local oversight mechanisms, fostering inclusive governance and building public participation are equally critical for rebuilding legitimacy and trust. Tackling corruption in post-conflict settings is not only essential for consolidating peace but also for laying the foundations of sustainable development and resilient institutions.
